新人求助，simply Fortran build报错

gamefun

新人求助。之前一直用学校的正版NAG Fortran，现在毕业了换了simply Fortran。原来可以运行的代码居然不能运行了。执行build project时提示：Error: Target (build\module.o) is defined recursively。字面意思是这个文件被重复定义，但是查了很多地方也没有给出更具体的说明，求教诸位，多谢多谢。以下是大部分的Makefile内容FC="C:\Program Files (x86)\Simply Fortran 2\mingw-w64\bin\gfortran.exe"
CC="C:\Program Files (x86)\Simply Fortran 2\mingw-w64\bin\gcc.exe"
AR="C:\Program Files (x86)\Simply Fortran 2\mingw-w64\bin\ar.exe"
WRC="C:\Program Files (x86)\Simply Fortran 2\mingw-w64\bin\windres.exe"
RM=rm -f

IDIR=

LDIR=


OPTFLAGS= -g

SPECIALFLAGS=$(IDIR)

RCFLAGS=-O coff

PRJ_FFLAGS=

PRJ_CFLAGS=

PRJ_LFLAGS=

FFLAGS=$(SPECIALFLAGS) $(OPTFLAGS) $(PRJ_FFLAGS) -Jmodules

CFLAGS=$(SPECIALFLAGS) $(OPTFLAGS) $(PRJ_CFLAGS)

"build\CFLUPOUT.o": ".\CFLUPOUT.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\diff.mod" "modules\prcp.mod" "modules\soil.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\CFLUPOUT.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\CFLUPOUT.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\CFLUPOUT.f90"

"build\CHZ.o": ".\CHZ.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\typedef.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\CHZ.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\CHZ.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\CHZ.f90"

"build\dbcm.o": ".\dbcm.f90" "modules\constants.mod" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\tsdata.mod" "modules\diff.mod" "modules\prcp.mod" "modules\soil.mod" "modules\bound.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\dbcm.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\dbcm.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\dbcm.f90"

"build\DIFWAV.o": ".\DIFWAV.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\diff.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\DIFWAV.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\DIFWAV.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\DIFWAV.f90"

"build\DIFWAV_QT.o": ".\DIFWAV_QT.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\diff.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\DIFWAV_QT.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\DIFWAV_QT.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\DIFWAV_QT.f90"

"build\DWCHCK.o": ".\DWCHCK.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\DWCHCK.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\DWCHCK.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\DWCHCK.f90"

"build\HYDBND.o": ".\HYDBND.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\tsdata.mod" "modules\bound.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\HYDBND.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\HYDBND.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\HYDBND.f90"

"build\HYDSUB_QT.o": ".\HYDSUB_QT.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\HYDSUB_QT.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\HYDSUB_QT.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\HYDSUB_QT.f90"

"build\INREBD.o": ".\INREBD.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\INREBD.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\INREBD.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\INREBD.f90"

"build\MCSUB_QT.o": ".\MCSUB_QT.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\MCSUB_QT.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\MCSUB_QT.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\MCSUB_QT.f90"

"build\module.o": ".\module.f90" "modules\util.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\module.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\module.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\module.f90"
"modules\constants.mod" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\tsdata.mod" "modules\diff.mod" "modules\prcp.mod" "modules\soil.mod" "modules\bound.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod" : "build\module.o" .EXISTSONLY
        @echo Compiling .\module.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\module.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\module.f90"

"build\PCP.o": ".\PCP.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\prcp.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\PCP.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\PCP.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\PCP.f90"

"build\QTMESH.o": ".\QTMESH.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\soil.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\QTMESH.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\QTMESH.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\QTMESH.f90"

"build\READIN.o": ".\READIN.f90" "modules\constants.mod" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\tsdata.mod" "modules\diff.mod" "modules\bound.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\READIN.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\READIN.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\READIN.f90"

"build\SOL.o": ".\SOL.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod" "modules\prcp.mod" "modules\soil.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\SOL.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\SOL.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\SOL.f90"

"build\SWE.o": ".\SWE.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\mod_solution.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\SWE.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\SWE.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\SWE.f90"

"build\SWE_QT.o": ".\SWE_QT.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\bound.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\SWE_QT.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\SWE_QT.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\SWE_QT.f90"

"build\TIN.o": ".\TIN.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\typedef.mod" "modules\morton.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\TIN.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\TIN.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\TIN.f90"

"build\util.o": ".\util.f90" "modules\constants.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\util.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\util.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\util.f90"
"modules\util.mod" : "build\util.o" .EXISTSONLY
        @echo Compiling .\util.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\util.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\util.f90"

"build\ZBND.o": ".\ZBND.f90" "modules\mod_controldata.mod" "modules\bound.mod"
        @echo Compiling .\ZBND.f90
        @$(FC) -c -o "build\ZBND.o" $(FFLAGS) ".\ZBND.f90"

li913

这里啥意思，重复？

gamefun

li913 发表于 2020-8-13 11:30
这里啥意思，重复？

我也很奇怪，点击build project之后，生成的Makefile就是这样了。

li913

可能是递归引用。a中引用b，b中引用a。这是不对的。

gamefun

li913 发表于 2020-8-13 14:49
可能是递归引用。a中引用b，b中引用a。这是不对的。

但是这个问题很奇怪。这个代码原本是在nag fortran上运行没有问题，然后又用vs code运行一遍也没问题，最后换到simply Fortran就出现这个报错，代码没做过更改，难道是SF的设置问题？

青衣巷

你既然把工程管理交给 Simply Fortran 了，那么实在没必要再去阅读makefile

请你给出你的工程文件内容，告知包含哪些源代码文件。可以截图以说明。

gamefun

青衣巷 发表于 2020-8-15 09:53
你既然把工程管理交给 Simply Fortran 了，那么实在没必要再去阅读makefile

请你给出你的工程文件内容，告 ...

感谢回复，我这个工程里， 主程序是dBCM.f90，module.f90是大部分的模块，然后其它的f90文件都是各个subroutine。都放在一个目录下，结构还是比较简单的